top of page
Global Response

Calls to oust U.N. official over Australian trip sponsored by Palestinian lobby groups

UN Watch
22.11.24
Image Source:
UN Watch Site - Screen Shot

This article highlights calls to remove a UN official accused of compromising impartiality by accepting a trip to Australia funded by Palestinian lobby groups, raising concerns about ethics and transparency in international diplomacy.

The article "Calls to oust U.N. official over Australian trip sponsored by Palestinian lobby groups" presents several key arguments:

  1. Violation of UN Code of Conduct: Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, allegedly breached the UN's Code of Conduct by accepting sponsorship for her Australian trip from Palestinian lobby groups, including the Australian Friends of Palestine Association and the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network. The Code mandates that Special Rapporteurs remain free from any external influence and prohibits accepting favors or remuneration from non-governmental sources.

  2. Compromised Impartiality: By accepting sponsorship from advocacy groups with vested interests, Albanese's impartiality is called into question. Her public statements during the trip, such as asserting that Israel's right to self-defense is "non-existent," suggest alignment with the sponsoring groups' agendas, further undermining her neutrality.

  3. Previous Controversial Statements: Albanese has a history of making contentious remarks, including stating that "America is subjugated by the Jewish Lobby" and telling a Hamas conference, "You have a right to resist." These statements have been criticized as antisemitic and supportive of terrorism, raising concerns about her suitability for the UN role.

  4. Call for Removal: UN Watch, an independent watchdog organization, has formally requested UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to remove Albanese from her position. They argue that her actions and statements violate UN principles and compromise the integrity of the Special Rapporteur's mandate.

These arguments collectively highlight concerns about ethical conduct, impartiality, and adherence to UN standards in the context of Albanese's role and actions.

Latest

Amnesty’s latest libel: Projecting Palestinian crimes onto Israel

Why the Palestinian Authority Cannot Allow Free Speech

Palestinian Authority/Fatah support Hamas’ hostage-taking policy

bottom of page